Brian Chang is Counsel in the Chicago and Silicon Valley offices of Eimer Stahl LLP. Before joining the firm, Brian was an associate at the San Francisco office of O’Melveny & Myers LLP. Brian has represented commercial clients in a variety of litigation matters in state and federal court at the trial and appellate levels, including before the United States Supreme Court. His practice includes representations in antitrust, securities, contract, and trade-secret litigation, as well as internal investigations and white-collar criminal matters.

Before law school, Brian was a consultant at the economic consulting firm of Cornerstone Research, where he supported experts providing testimony in antitrust, banking, accounting, and securities litigation. 

Experience

Case Experience

  • Pro Music Rights, LLC v. Apple Inc., et al., District of Connecticut, No. 3:20-cv-00309: Antitrust and unfair trade-practices lawsuit related to performance rights of musical works.
  • In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, Northern District of California, MDL No. 1917: Multi-district antitrust litigation concerning alleged price-fixing of cathode ray tubes.
  • Day, et al. v. Humana, Inc., et al., Northern District of Illinois, No. 1:19-cv-03141: Representing Humana in putative class action alleging breach of fiduciary duties and wrongful denial of benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
  • In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. II), District of District of Columbia, MDL No. 2925: Representing major purchasers of rail-freight shipping services in antitrust litigation against railroads to recover overpayments due to price-fixing conspiracy.
  • Jones, et al. v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al., Northern District of California, No. 4:18-cv-02518 (and related cases):  Direct and indirect purchaser class-action antitrust lawsuits concerning alleged price-fixing of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM).
  • In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation, Northern District of California, MDL No. 2420: Direct and indirect class- and direct-action antitrust lawsuits concerning alleged price-fixing of lithium-ion battery cells and lithium ion batteries.
  • In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation, Northern District of California, MDL No. 2801:  Direct and indirect class- and direct-action antitrust lawsuits concerning alleged price-fixing of capacitors.
  • In re Resistors Antitrust Litigation, Northern District of California, No. 5:15-cv-3820:  Direct and indirect class- and direct-action antitrust lawsuits concerning alleged price-fixing of resistors.
  • Tibble v. Edison International, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 13-550:  Merits briefing on scope of fiduciary duty under ERISA to monitor investments.

Recognitions

Honors & Recognitions

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America, 2021-2024

News

Speaking Engagements

  • "Practical Antitrust," South Carolina Bar Convention
    January 21, 2022
  • Big Tech & Beyond: Antitrust in the Biden Era
    June 10, 2021
  • Illinois, December 15, 2016

J.D., University of Michigan Law School, 2012

  • Magna cum laude
  • Clarence Darrow Scholarship (full-tuition merit scholarship)

M.A., Stanford University, 2006

B.A., Stanford University, 2006

  • Law Clerk to the Honorable Robert E. Bacharach, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Law Clerk to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

  • Illinois
  • California
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jump to Page

By using this site, you agree to our updated Terms of Use.